Sunday, October 12, 2008

U.S. Could Lose Space-Spy Dominance

Report Warns U.S. Could Lose Space-Spy Dominance

By Noah Shachtman
October 07, 2008 6:42:00 PM
Categories:
Space
Courtesy Of: Wired Blog Network [
Wired ]

America has become so lousy at building spy satellites that "the United States is losing its preeminence in space," a Congressional intelligence report declares. What's worse, this decline comes as "emerging space powers such as Russia, India and China" are getting better and better at snooping from above.

The gloomy report, approved last Friday by the House's technical and tactical intelligence subcommittee, was originally obtained by CQ scoopster Tim Starks. "A once robust partnership between the U.S. Government and the American space industry has been weakened by years of demanding space programs, the exponential complexity of technology, and an inattention to acquisition discipline," the document states.

NASA's woes get most of the headlines — especially since the U.S. civilian space program may be forced to depend on Russia to get into orbit. But the American military space effort has been a wreck for quite some time, too. Misty, a super-secret satellite program had to be canceled last year. Since 1999, the military has spent nearly $10 billion to produce a set of so-called "Future Imagery Architecture" eyes in orbit. When they finally managed to launch one in 2006, it died instantly — and then had to be shot down, before it plummeted to Earth. Earlier this year, the once-secretive, once-proud Pentagon agency that oversees spy satellites, the National Reconnaissance Agency, had some of its authority stripped away. More recently, a high-level military commission recommended shuttering the office entirely.

Part of the problem is that the United States has "no comprehensive space architecture or strategic plan [for] current and future national security priorities," the report states. Part of the problem is that the country's military and intelligence agencies have overlapping, confusing lines of authority. Part of the problem is regulatory — export restrictions often get in the way of satellite-building efforts.

But the main issue, the panel concluded, is cash. "Research and development (R&D) receives inconsistent funding despite the link between many failed acquisition programs and insufficient upfront R&D investment. Research investment must be treated like a national priority," the panelists write. "Fixing the issues that exist will not take a monumental effort like the 'Manhattan Project,' but it will take a paradigm shift."

Which may be easier said that done, given how tight government budgets are likely to be in the years ahead.
ALSO:

Commission: Kill Spy Sat Agency

Must-Watch Video: Inside the Satellite Shootdown

Sat Shoot-Down, the Musical

Air Force Wants to Counter Sat-Killers, ASAP

Pentagon: $520 Million for Space Weapons Research

His Ship Shot the Satellite

Sat Shoot-Down Logo Revealed!

Operation Rogue Satellite: The PR Plan

Spy Satellite Blast, Caught on Tape

Sat Shot Faces Political Fallout

A Warm, Fuzzy Satellite Interceptor

Satellite Debris? FEMA Will Save Us!

Video: Satellite Shoot-Down, Simulated

Wham! Navy Blasts Rogue Satellite

'Seconds' Per Day to Take Out Rogue Satellite

Rogue Satellite's Rotten, $10 Billion Legacy

Wildlife Refuge Braces for Spy Sat Rain

Pentagon Flack Flummoxed by Satellite Shooters

Bad Weather Delays Satellite Shot

Sat-Killer's Track Record

Name the Rogue Satellite Operation

Dying Satellite's Toxic Danger: Way, Way Low

Lewis: Don't Shoot the Spy Sat

Satellite Shoot-Down Set: Intercept Near Hawaii; Debris Cloud Over Canada

Operation Rogue Satellite: The Latest

Experts Scoff at Sat Shoot-Down Rationale

Inside America's Satellite-Killing Missile

Skeptical About the Rogue Spy Sat 'Shot'

Rogue Spy Sat, Sketched

Pentagon Unveils Rogue Spy Sat Shoot-Down Plan

Pentagon to Shoot Down Rogue Satellite

U.S. May Shoot Down Errant Satellite

Falling Spy Sat: Don't Panic

Spy Satellite Will Plummet to Earth

"Autonomous" Mini-Spacecraft Team up to Replace Big Sats

Lockheed Lost in Space

Death of a Satellite

No comments: